Thursday, February 18, 2010
February 18th, 2010
Response to three prompt questions
Wednesday, February 17, 2010
Art of Creativity
Thursday, February 11, 2010
February 11th, 2010
February 11th, 2010
1. How can the attitudes toward sound we discussed in class be applied to the works of these two artists? Januk Schaefer is clearly a noise appreciator. His work is based around listening to silence, and realizing that there really is no such thing as silence. He listens to, and emphasizes what we consider to be white noise coming from outdoors or from around the corner. Stephen Vitiello is a Sound Beautification artist and is interested in creating a kind of music with sounds he finds. It is rhythmical, has a beat, harmony, and melody. It sounds as if it goes with some sort of display just like the one with the bulbs we looked at in class.
2. What formal vocabulary can you use to describe their works? Januk Schaefer's work is mostly industrial, but working with noise that is not commonly acknowledged as interesting sound. It is noise we drown out, so he takes it and creates an ambient background. It is not necessarily clear but there is certainly simultaneity throughout. Stephen Vitiello is all about creating a musical feel which either tells a story or describes an emotion. He uses tone, pitch, amplitude, beat, and harmony to his advantage to create a mood.
3. Do you agree more with the Sound Explorers approach and attitudes toward sound or would you prefer one of the other groups discussed in class? Personally, I do not agree with either of their approaches. While I do believe that Sound Beautification can contribute to an environment's atmosphere, I am much more of a nature sound lover. There is nothing more beautiful than the natural sounds that we cannot necessarily hear in an urban setting.
